Best Amazons 3 Alternatives will be discussed in this article. One of the most popular technologies for object storage, cloud computing, and file hosting is Amazon S3. By the end of 2021, the cloud infrastructure industry was worth a staggering $180 billion, and Amazon was still the global leader with a share of almost 33%. It provides a wide scope of features that are ideal for any size organization, from small to medium-sized businesses to systems built for large corporations.
Amazon S3 (commonly known as AWS S3) may not always be the multiple suitable option for your purposes, though. You’ve found the proper location if you’re seeking for a good Amazon S3 substitute. As seasoned SEO professionals and affiliate marketers, we recognize the value of using the best tools and techniques to enhance your online visibility and increase revenue production.
We have painstakingly compiled this list of AWS S3 alternatives using our extensive expertise and experience with various cloud storage providers to assist you in selecting the best solution for your specific storage and file hosting needs.
Top 7 Best Amazons 3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2023
In this article, you can know about Amazons 3 Alternatives here are the details below;
1. Digital Ocean Spaces (Editor’s Choice)
A potential choice worth considering is Digital Ocean Spaces if you want to entirely get rid of any of the top three cloud storage companies (AWS, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage). This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
There are other specialized cloud and object storage providers (as mentioned above) that offer far better pricing if you simply plan on leaving Amazon S3’s storage and keeping some of your AWS services. are S3 compatible, but as well. The advantage of Digital Ocean over the inexpensive Amazon S3 competitors we’ve so far listed is that it also supplies a wide range of other services, such as managed cloud hosting and servers.
Why It Surpasses Amazon S3
- S3 Amazon
- Storage costs $0.02 per GB per month and $0.021 per GB per month.
- GBs of bandwidth: $0.09
- Requests for GET: $0.0004/1000
- 5GB of free space for 12 months
- DSpaces on the internet
- Broadband: Integrated
- GET Requests: Contains
- There is no free space.
- 250 GB of storage, 1000 GB of bandwidth, and 5000K GET requests cost a total of $97.75.
- $5 is the total cost for 250 GB of storage, 1000 GB of bandwidth, and 5000K GET requests.
Pros
- Pricing stability
- Storage costs are less overall than with S3 (reads, writes, and other API actions are not subject to additional fees).
- Simpler to incorporate
- More user-friendly and less complex to utilize than AWS
- Integrated CDN
- Decrease in latency while supplying static resources like website files
- Compatible with S3
- A user-friendly UI
- Dashboard with drag and drop
- Outstanding documentation
Cons
- There is a $5 minimum monthly fee.
- Spaces only permit storage in 5 spots.
- Only a few connected services are needed to move the rest of the cloud.
- No available intelligent tiering
- Functions are not triggered by events.
- View the Spaces on Digital Ocean
2. Google Cloud Platform
Google’s Cloud Platform serves as a direct competitor to Microsoft Azure and Amazon S3 as a cloud service provider. One of the “big 3” cloud storage services, it works best for large companies. For your enterprise’s data storing requirements, Google Cloud can compete with Amazon S3 in terms of capabilities, customizability, and complexity. Google is a better cloud service if you have to choose between them but you require substantial multi-region capabilities. This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
It is a full-spectrum AWS S3 substitute with worldwide coverage, with a presence in over 24 locations. If you need hot storage, cloud is also preferable to S3, delivering cheaper costs than Amazon S3 Infrequent Access. When it comes to cold archival storage, Google is often inferior to S3, with Amazon’s Glacier Deep Archive[2] being the superior choice.
Why It Surpasses Amazon S3
- S3 Amazon
- Hot Storage: $0.023 per month (per GB)
- Cool Storage: $0.0125 per gigabyte per month
- Cold storage costs $0.004 for S3 Glacier or $0.00099 for Deep Glacier.
- Cloud Storage by Google
- Hot Storage: $0.026 per gigabyte per month
- Cool Storage: $0.07 per GB each month
- $0.004 ($/GB/month) for cold storage
Hot storage is for data that is accessed often. For data that is used less frequently yet needs quick access, use cool storage. Low-cost storage for data archiving is known as cold storage.
Pros
- Improved capability for multiple regions
- 140 locations, 24 regions, and 40+ global data centers
- Superior to S3 for hot storage
- More Affordable Alternatives To Using Duplicate Storage For Redundancy
- Alternative to AWS that is complete (and goes beyond object storage)
- Google Cloud Storage provides 5GB of free storage, similar to S3.
Cons
- Glacier Deep Archive is less expensive than Cold Archival Storage.
- The cost of hot storage is only somewhat higher.
- The minimum retention period for archives is 365 days, and deleting them sooner would result in additional fees.
3. Azure Blob Storage
The greatest candidates for Azure Blob Storage are businesses that use the Microsoft ecosystem. It excels at handling big file sizes and lets you append existing files, something that Amazon S3 does not do. However, Azure is not the ideal choice for you if you’re seeking for a service that is easier to use than Amazon S3. In fact, its intricacy and feature diversity are on par with those of Amazon S3. Its pricing is equally complicated and might not be suitable for consumers working on smaller projects. This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
Why It Surpasses Amazon S3
- S3 Amazon
- Hot Storage: $0.023 per month (per GB)
- Cool Storage: $0.0125 per gigabyte per month
- Cold storage costs $0.004 for S3 Glacier or $0.00099 for Deep Glacier.
Cloud Storage by Google
- Hot Storage: $0.0166-$0.018 per gigabyte per month
- $0.01 per GB per month for Cool Storage
- GB/month for cold storage: $0.00099
Hot storage is for data that is accessed often. For data that is used less frequently yet needs quick access, use cool storage. Low-cost storage for data archiving is known as cold storage.
Pros
- Can effectively store and retrieve big files.
- Enables you to add new files to existing ones.
- Has a wider selection of storage-related goods
- The cost of cold archival storage is comparable to Amazon’s
- Cheaper per GB than S3’s hot storage
Cons
- Performance is less impressive than Amazon’s
- Has extremely complicated pricing (including Amazon’s)
- Every edition of Azure storage services has a significantly varied pricing structure.
4.Storj DCS
Another inexpensive cloud object storage provider is Storj DCS. The unique aspect of Storj is its decentralized technology, though. The architecture of Storj DCS is entirely decentralized, trustless, and open-source. This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
Because of its decentralized structure, Storj DCS may duplicate applications across geographical regions and benefit from natural geo-redundancy. Even though Storj DCS doesn’t allow free egress (data movement to an external site), it is still very economical and has no restrictions like other providers. Developers trust the security features for the majority of applications because they are comparable to centralized solutions like AWS.
Why It Surpasses Amazon S3
- S3 Amazon
- Storage costs $0.021/GB each month
- Download for $0.05+ per GB
- 5GB of free space for 12 months
- Saint DCS
- 80%+ cheaper storage at $0.004 ($/GB/month)
- Download for $0.007. ($/GB)
- 150GB Free Storage
Pros
- Free object storage and bandwidth of 150 GB
- Low cost ($4/TB/mo) object storage each month
- Independent object storage
- Geo-redundant and multi-regional by default
- Simple pricing methods
- Built-in security guidelines
- Native replication in a number of different places
- There is no set period limit for maintaining files.
- No data lock-in (move it around at will)
Cons
- Does not give pricing tiering that is clever
- Lack of integration with other native AWS services
- Insufficiently strict access controls
- Missing features for lifecycles, versions, and tags
- Lambda functions are not triggered by eventing.
- Unsuitable for storing numerous files that are just 4 KB in size.
- A “per segment” fee levied by Storj DCS relates to the quantity and size of individual files.
Storj DCS is not an inexpensive substitute for Amazon S3 if your project requires storage for a large number of little files.
5.Backblaze B2
One of the most affordable object storage providers available right now is Backblaze B2. But its fundamental components aren’t the greatest. Backblaze B2, which was established in 2007, has gained notoriety by promoting the fact that it can be purchased for as little as one-fourth the price of Amazon S3. That’s a savings of up to 75%, people!
If you need storage with frequent (or infrequent) access and only sporadic connectivity to AWS, this is a great choice. Since Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive[1] is a less expensive solution, it is not well suited for cold archive scenarios (for rarely data access). This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
How It Outperforms Cloud Services from Amazon S3
- S3 Amazon
- Storage costs $0.021/GB each month
- Download for $0.05+ per GB
- 5GB of free space for 12 months
- B2 Backblaze
- 80%+ cheaper storage price of $0.005 ($/GB/month)
- Download for $0.01 ($/GB)
- 10GB of free storage
Pros
- Lower storage costs ($5/TB/month as a starting point)
- Cheaper bandwidth
- Easy pricing
- Free exit to Cloudflare CDN or Fastly
- Free storage for the first 10GB
- No monthly minimum fees
- Straightforward dashboard
- Faster and simpler setup
- Keys with restricted access (read-only or write-only)
- If you prefer utilizing the command line, there is an integrated CLI.
Cons
- Connections to native services that are more quickly
- There are just 3 areas between the US and Europe.
- No versioning or tagging is possible.
- Events cannot be created to activate functionalities
- No clever tiering
- Visit Backblaze B2
6. Wasabi
Wasabi Hot Storage, a relatively young participant in the cloud and object storage space, was formed in 2017. Wasabi solely concentrates on offering top-notch storage, as opposed to competing in many facets of cloud computing. This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
Wasabi Hot Storage sets itself apart from market leaders like Amazon S3 by providing storage that is up to 80% less expensive and six times faster. That’s a significant assertion that has recently lured many developers away from the S3 and AWS ecosystems on its own.
It’s also essential to maintain in intellect that Wasabi is probably not the best choice for your needs if you require other services, such as cloud servers. Wasabi may certainly compete with S3 as a substitute for small- to medium-sized use cases and personal projects.
Additionally, it’s ideal for situations in which you occasionally need quick and inexpensive access to a few files. Wasabi’s fair use and download restrictions make it less suitable if you frequently need to access a large number of files.
Why It Surpasses Amazon S3
- S3 Amazon
- Storage costs $0.021/GB each month
- Download for $0.05+ per GB
- 5GB of free space for 12 months
- Wasabi
- 80%+ cheaper storage price of $0.00599 ($/GB/month)
- No costs for API requests or egress
- No Free Storage
Pros
- Simpler pricing system
- Reduced prices
- API requests and free egress
- More than six times as quick as S3
- A sleek and clean interface
- Integrated security measures
Cons
- Even if you don’t save any data, there is a $5.99 minimum fee due each month.
- Fair use policies and download volumes have a limit.
- Limited egress and access to documents
- Lack of integration with other native AWS services
- Missing features for lifecycles, versions, and tags
- Functions are not triggered by events.
7.IBM Cloud Object Storage
Although IBM’s cloud object storage solution is not frequently regarded as one of the “big 3” cloud storage providers, it deserves a place on this list. IBM is a cloud VPS provider as well, and its services are quite scalable, adaptable, and straightforward with top-notch speed to boot! This is another Amazons 3 Alternatives.
Without sacrificing any enterprise-level functionality, you can store massive volumes of data with ease using AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure Blob Storage. Data migration or access to and from system storage is made simple by IBM’s intuitive (and highly interactive) interface.
Pros
- A pay-as-you-go system
- Interactive and user-friendly dashboard interface
- Scalability and top-notch performance
- Gives users access to files up to 10TB in size, surpassing Amazon’s 5TB limit.
- IBM provides less expensive multi-region choices than S3 similar to Google Cloud.
- More storage levels available
- Has API compatible with S3
- TIERING with intelligence is an option.
- Offers an event to cause functions
- Additionally offered are versioning and tagging.
Cons
- Unsuitable for small-scale users
- More sophisticated pricing schemes
- More complex than S3, and it can take more work to set it up properly for your needs.
- It might wind up costing more than Amazon, Google, or Azure
- View the IBM Cloud
What Is Amazon simple storage service (S3)?
The abbreviation “Amazon S3” stands for “Amazon Simple Storage Service,” a well-liked web host among developers that also provides object storage service. You can store objects (like cloud files) and retrieve them via an API using this cloud and object storage service. Amazon-S3-AWS-Page
Developers and programmers who require more sophisticated capabilities (such scalable object storage, greater security, and API connections) than what the majority of data and web hosting companies supply will find it useful. In the area of cloud and object storage, Amazon S3 has blazed a trail of innovation with its industry-leading scalability.
Amazon S3 can be used by businesses of any size and in any sector to store data and files for a variety of purposes. However, not everyone will find Amazon S3 to be the ideal answer. It’s challenging to integrate with other systems and tools due to a sense of complexity and excess. Additionally, there is the issue of price; one of the main arguments against using Amazon is its price.
When to Switch or leave Amazon S3
Due to its quick innovation, unmatched scalability, and plenty of native connectors, Amazon S3 is still regarded as the safest option. Amazon S3 cannot, however, continue to offer the greatest services overall when newer object storage providers enhance their offerings.
So if you’re still unsure about whether an Amazon S3 substitute is the best option for you or if it’s time to move, let’s assist you in making a decision right away. You Should Continue Using Amazon S3 If you utilize any native AWS services, such as Amazon Athena, and Amazon S3 is a key component of or tightly integrated into your tech stack, you are better off continuing to use S3.
If you transport a lot of data inside your region, sticking with Amazon S3 might also be advantageous. There might be no cost savings for these features from other providers. In actuality, switching to a different cloud object storage service provider only based on lower pricing would not be worthwhile.
For instance, if you download more than you post to your storage, you can be fined or banned from other services entirely. And let’s not forget that Amazon, the market leader in cloud storage, provides simple access and seamless connectivity with all other AWS services.
In order to provide quicker and more efficient development alternatives, many developers rely on AWS for various services, and they all collaborate closely with S3. This being said, it might be worthwhile to investigate a different option if you’re seeking for a less expensive solution or one with stronger built-in security.
Advantages of AWS S3 Storage services
- The cheapest way to store data is on Amazon Glacier Deep, which costs as little as $0.00099/GB/month.
- Pay just what you really use.
- High performance and data retrieval speed
- It can function as a file store for multiple servers and is centralized.
- Very scalable, with intelligent pricing that adjusts to your usage every month.
- There are several libraries for almost every programming language.
- May migrate and integrate into many other systems without difficulty
- Has an open API standard that is native
Disadvantages of AWS S3 Storage Services
- If all you need is storage, there are much more affordable alternatives available.
- Lack of flexibility in Next.js’s server-side rendering, for example
- It is challenging to significantly increase search engine optimization if your websites are hosted through S3.
Need a cheaper option?
It’s no secret that S3 costs as much as AWS’ cloud object storage service. While the cost of storing files is quite low, with Amazon’s Glacier Deep tier being the most affordable storage available, retrieving your files can result in significant costs. Amazon S3 had minimal market rivalry up until recently.
You may now find a lot of less expensive alternatives to S3 storage as new object storage providers are emerging and providing competitive pricing. Simply put, it depends on your use case and the S3 services you utilize frequently. You can run your application outside of the Amazon ecosystem and save up to 80% as long as your storage solution doesn’t require direct integration with any AWS services. For other affordable object storage options, we suggest looking into Wasabi, Backblaze B2, and Storj DCS.
Need Easier Built-in Security?
Another factor that makes many people think about leaving S3 is security. Even for basic security instances, there is a lot that goes into making cloud storage secure. It is undoubtedly difficult to provide baseline security with Amazon S3 without incurring large overhead expenses and development effort requirements. In-built security is a good bonus with all the many services you would need to connect to your cloud storage and the increased risks, vulnerabilities, or potential development faults. Consider an S3 substitute like Storj if you want to simplify your life by choosing a solution with built-in security measures.
A decentralized storage service called Storj also provides encrypted data chunked and spread by default among several areas. The fundamental security advantages of a decentralized storage solution often meet best practice criteria for the majority of applications. Therefore, you may take advantage of the fundamental built-in security features with less work and price.
Which Amazon S3 alternative Do we Recommend?
Digital Ocean is the finest option for you if you’re searching for Amazon S3 alternatives. It is simple to use, has flawless speed, and permits you to save a considerable amount of data swiftly. In comparison to its rivals, Digital Ocean offers the greatest costs, has unlimited storage space, and has more exceptional features. Digital Ocean is the ideal cloud computing and file hosting solution if you need to replace your Amazon S3 utility.
